Player value · combination series · hub
Combination hub: pairs of behaviours, not one score
One “engagement” number can hide two different lives: someone who focuses deeply once a week, and someone who returns every day for five minutes. Both can look “active.” Product decisions get sharper when you name pairs of behaviours — focus and return, depth and recovery, spend and trust after friction — instead of a single score.
This hub frames the idea. Colour labels sit in one short note; then genre honesty, multi-membership, and contribution. We use AFITMRR™ labels (Attention · Frequency · Intensity · Tenure · Monetary · Referral · Resilience) after the plain meaning — not instead of it.
About this series. Illustrative archetypes and colours for conversation in the room. Your “up / down,” weights, and which pairs matter are title-specific. Live inventory and roadmap on your events is deeper work when you need it.
Path: Colours · Genres · Multi-membership · Contribution weight
What this changes in practice
| Common view | Combination view |
|---|---|
| One engaged segment | Several pairs: e.g. high focus × thin return ≠ high focus × high return |
| Radar or spider of seven metrics all “high = good” | Genre-honest strength peaks — social puzzle needs Referral; strategy may not |
| Player is one permanent type | People hold several pairs with soft weights; membership moves week to week |
| Biggest volume segment wins the roadmap | Volume and value weightage — see also contribution weight |
| Red = bad user, green = good user | Colours are working labels: protect · opportunity · learn — stage-specific |
How to read a pair (at a glance)
- 1 Both strong Behaviours compound — usually protect and feed. Green · ↑ × ↑
- 2 Mixed One strong, one weak — opportunity if you act; not automatic failure. Orange · ↑ × ↓
- 3 Both weak or harmful drop Challenge / regret — learn the path that got them there. Red
- 4 Direction Moving into healthier pairs is opportunity; sliding out of strength is the hard challenge. Paths, not only snapshots
- 5 Genre honesty Strategy and social puzzle can both be healthy with different strength peaks. Radars below · optional
- 6 Do not chase all 42 Name the pairs that are large, movable, and honest for the game you shipped. 7×7 with self×self blank
The seven lenses (quick)
| Lens | Plain question |
|---|---|
| A Attention | Do they show up and focus? |
| F Frequency | How often do they return? |
| I Intensity | How deep is a session when they are here? |
| T Tenure | How long have they been with you? |
| M Monetary | Do they fund the product fairly? |
| R Referral | Do they bring others? |
| Rs Resilience | Do they recover after friction or dry spells? |
Crossing two different lenses (not a lens with itself) gives combination cells. You name the few that matter for your title — not a universal scoreboard of all cells.
What to read next
Colours are collapsed into one note. Then genre, paths, and load.
- 1 Colours Protect · opportunity · learn — green / orange / red in one breath. Examples without the triple essay
- 2 Genre makeups Same business health, different strength peaks. Strategy · social puzzle · shooter
- 3 Multi-membership Soft weights, paths, appetite. People sit in more than one box
- 4 Contribution weight Volume vs KPI load on a named box. Teaching case · A×F
Volume is not weightage · contribution
A combination cell can be large in volume and still light on the value the business actually funds — retention, revenue, referral, recovery after friction. Another cell can be small in volume and carry a disproportionate share of spend, tenure, or social pull. Volume is not weightage — value is weightage. Treat them as two axes on every box you care about.
That is why it is useful to know the contribution of each box, not only who sits in it:
- Volume — how many players (or sessions) land in this combination right now — size, not staffing.
- Value weightage — how much of the outcomes you fund the product on this box carries (e.g. share of D30 retained, share of revenue, share of invites, share of recoveries after dry spells). Value is the weightage.
- Contribution — the product of those stories: a modest high-value box can outrank a crowded low-value mass; a huge low-value mass can still matter if it is the on-ramp into green.
Read both. “Most of our players are here” is volume. “Most of our value sits here” is weightage. Roadmaps that chase only the biggest or only the richest miss half the truth.
Worked teaching case: Contribution weight · A×F.
What to do next
Early journey: hub. Contribution: volume vs value weightage. Primer: seven lenses.
AFITMRR™ · combination series
Hub → colours → genres → multi-membership → contribution.
Combination series
- Combination hub · how to read pairs
- Colours · protect · opportunity · learn
- Genre makeups · radars
- Multi-membership · paths
- Contribution weight · volume vs load
Also in the library
Use the language — or map pairs on your title
Free scorecard for the seven lenses. Inventory of combinations, contribution, and a live roadmap on your events is partnership work when you want that depth.
